Another levy in 2011? District leaders say it's needed
* Worthington school board members still are trying to find
ways to save money, but some parents don't like the ideas so
far.
By PAMELA WILLIS
Published: Tuesday, May 25, 2010
5:31 PM EDT
Worthington City School District voters may see another
operating levy request as soon as next year, despite passing
a tax issue last fall.
Treasurer Jeff McCuen said the district's new five-year
forecast shows expenses exceeding revenue by more than $2.6
million by the end of June, which is the end of fiscal year
2010.
A carryover balance keeps the district from an actual budget
deficit until 2014, but the deficit would be a big one that
year, McCuen said: more than $15.6 million.
Numbers fluctuate, but what won't change is the bottom line,
McCuen said, and the district is now spending more than it's
taking in.
McCuen said Tuesday, May 25, that the numbers in the monthly
financial report "look like we'll doing a little better than
the forecast. We'll still be in deficit spending, but maybe
not to that degree."
Voters approved a 6.9-mill incremental levy request in
November 2009 after turning down a 7.4-mill tax issue in May
2009.
The bottom line means more cuts or more revenue, McCuen
said.
He said a 6-mill levy request in November 2011 would provide
$26.4 million -- enough to last through 2014.
Without those funds, a 10-mill levy would be needed in
November 2012, with another request on its heels one year
later, he said.
McCuen said he never promised the incremental tax issue
would be enough to last three years.
Worthington school board members discussed some of the
district's financial woes in a workshop held May 7 and the
board meeting held May 10. McCuen presented the new
financial forecast at that time, prompting board Vice
President Marc Schare to say, "Something has to change or we
are about to fall off a cliff."
Schare said a change in staff members' negotiated agreements
should be considered, instead of cutting more school
programs.
Board members responded to Schare's comment and discussed
the financial situation again at the board meeting Monday,
May 24.
"We are not anywhere close to a cliff," said board member
Charlie Wilson.
"I am convinced this community will not allow this district
to fall off a cliff -- it just can't happen," he said.
"Other districts are much closer to falling off a cliff than
we are. I'm firmly committed to keep this district as a
district of choice and I think our community is also
committed to this."
"I don't want to be in a line of lemmings watching other
districts fall off a cliff and say, 'Well, we weren't the
first to go,' " board member David Bressman responded.
Bressman said at the work session that changes in the school
program should be discussed, such as reconfiguring
elementary schools into K-3 and 4-6 buildings, instead of
each one holding grades K-6. He also suggested creating a
sixth-grade building in Perry Middle School.
Perry Middle School is scheduled to close this fall, leaving
only the Phoenix program in the building as Perry students
move to the McCord building.
Two parents spoke to board members during the May 24 meeting
regarding Bressman's ideas.
Michelle Colter Dickson said "elementary school parents do
not want our neighborhood schools changed or to have our
children bused across town.
"We don't want to be in the position of the middle school
parents, who have no voice in the closing of their school,"
she said.
Dickson said she is ready to be on a parent-administrator
task force "immediately."
Bressman assured her "there is no task force to discuss
reconfiguration."
"Nothing has been decided and there are no back-door deals,"
he said. "I brought reconfiguration up at the work session
because I thought we should discuss these things. Nothing is
a done deal, but I said what I did because we have to
discuss ways to save money.
"I will not vote to approve putting a levy request on the
ballot next year unless we have those discussions," Bressman
said.
Schare said the district is struggling to operate "under
constraints" that include a parent base that seems to
indicate changes such as the middle school restructuring and
any thought of reconfiguration to save money will be
resisted.
"And the community has told us by their votes we cannot
expect to pass levies in excess of 7 mills," he said.
He said the state legislature is throwing a steady stream of
unfunded mandates at school districts.
"The administration has done what they can by looking for
cuts without hurting the program; however, despite the cuts,
we are where we are, with the promise of more cuts to come,
more community angst and more over-the-top levy campaigns
where we have to threaten to cut everything under the sun to
win increasingly larger millages at increasingly shorter
intervals," he said.
Schare said he hoped board members could use the first two
months of summer to look at the state audit report, the
Treasurer's Advisory Committee recommendations, "and get on
with making the structural changes necessary to get to
reasonable levies at reasonable intervals.
"I hope we don't try to start another levy campaign until we
do that," he said.