|
Adequate Yearly Progress
District takes aim at state's 'moving target'
By
PAMELA WILLIS
Worthington City Schools have a lot to celebrate
since earning an "excellent" on the state report
card six years in a row.
But not meeting the state's Adequate Yearly
Progress requirement could cause a drop in that
rating.
Assessment Coordinator Jennifer Wene reported on
the state rankings and the impact of Adequate
Yearly Progress at Monday's school board
meeting, held at the Worthington Education
Center.
"The good news is the fact we met 25 of 25 state
indicators, and we are still the largest
district to meet all the standards for six years
in a row," Wene said.
Wene said performance levels also went up, and
all the school buildings were rated either
excellent or "effective" on the state report
card.
The state requires a graduation rate of 90
percent to meet its standards. Worthington's
graduation rate was 97.9 percent last school
year, and the student attendance rate was 95.7
percent, Wene said. The state requires a 93
percent attendance rate.
But the AYP goals can be elusive, Wene said.
"The goal of AYP under the No Child Left Behind
act is that all subgroups progress to 100
percent student success by 2013," Wene said.
"This year, we did not meet AYP in three areas:
in IEP (students with disabilities on Individual
Education Plans) reading and math, and LEP
(Limited English Proficient) reading."
Wene said the Hilliard City School District
would have rated excellent this year because it
met all the state indicators -- but it did not
meet AYP for the third year, so the district was
given a "continuous improvement" rating.
"Yes, our state rating could be impacted if we
don't meet AYP for three years in a row in more
than one subgroup," Wene said. "If we do not
meet that requirement next year, we could be in
danger of that, but I predict our AYP levels
will rise."
Wene said AYP is "a moving target," because the
achievement goals are raised each year.
"We have added achievement in some groups and
dropped in other groups each year, because
different grade levels and different groups of
students are taking the tests," Wene said.
"Beginning this year, though, we will test AYP
in all grade levels, which will make it easier
to track our progress."
The AYP subgroups are African-American, American
Indian/native Alaskan, Asian/Pacific Islander,
Hispanic, multiracial, white, economically
disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient and
Students with Disabilities (IEP).
Wene said some schools meet AYP standards
because they don't have enough students in each
subgroup.
"All our elementary buildings passed AYP because
they don't have large-enough subgroups to
measure," Wene said. "Kilbourne Middle School
and Worthingway Middle School did not meet AYP
because they are feeder schools into Thomas
Worthington, which did not meet AYP this year in
IEP reading."
Wene said it was Worthington Kilbourne High
School that did not meet AYP last year.
"There are strategies buildings can use to try
to raise AYP," Wene said. "It's not about
working harder, but working smarter. Vicky
Hartley at Worthington Kilbourne worked with
teachers to build more inclusive classrooms and
they all did an outstanding job bringing up
proficiency in all their subgroups."
Wene said the district will work to increase
achievement "one learner at a time.
"We've met with each principal to go over their
continuous-improvement plans and we are looking
closely at best practices," Wene said. "We will
work closely with buildings on their school
portfolios and on professional development in
Understanding by Design and leadership training.
"In Worthington, we really believe that even one
child falling behind is not acceptable," Wene
said.
Wene said the SOAR program, provided by a
partnership with Battelle and many area
districts, will help supply "value-added" data.
"Value-added data is exciting because you can
see that a student is growing academically, even
if they are not achieving yet to proficient
standards," Wene said. "Our subgroups that are
not achieving are so small that it will be an
investigative process between principals,
teachers, parents and students to find out how
much better we can teach each student to improve
their achievement." |