With levy passed, Worthington takes close look at finances
Officials will continue to scour district programs for
opportunities to trim costs
By PAMELA WILLIS
Published: Tuesday, November 24,
2009 5:19 PM EST
Worthington school board members worked on a plan for
financial stability this week as they cast a critical eye on
future expenses.
Superintendent Melissa Conrath rolled out the first draft of
a document titled "Planning for Fiscal Stability" at a board
workshop session Monday, Nov. 23.
"A stable financial forecast, which includes predictable
revenue, is a critical component to Worthington schools'
ability to plan for the educational needs of its students,"
Conrath states in the first line of the document.
Conrath told board members the district has to consider the
question, "Where do we go from here?" even though the
district's 6.9-mill incremental levy request was successful
Nov. 3.
"We were at risk for not passing a tax issue, so we went for
a reduced millage request," she said. "We won't generate the
same amount of revenue with the incremental levy that we
would have with the 7.4-mill request, so we will want to
work cooperatively with our community to work out a way we
can come back to them at reasonable levels and at reasonable
intervals."
A 7.4-mill levy request was turned down by district voters
in May.
Conrath said some budget reductions will be necessary
despite the successful levy passage, partly due to the
uncertainty of state funding and the likely phasing out of
business tangible tax reimbursement.
She said identifying budget reduction options "will require
careful planning and involve input from a variety of
stockholders."
Conrath outlined a vision on the fiscal planning document
that stated Worthington schools would "ensure all students
master the essential curriculum and beyond; close the
achievement gap among subgroups of the student population;
and develop competence in 21st-century content, learning
skills and tools."
Conrath said she wanted to put together a budget review team
by early December to consider each of the district's program
offerings and determine "whether to keep, reduce, redesign
or eliminate" the program.
"I'd like to identify any possible budget reductions by
March of next year to determine if we are closing the gap
between what we have in our budget and what we need," she
said.
Conrath said the review team will identify the rationale
behind each program or service, the resources allocated to
support it, and performance measures and outcomes, and
consider any alternative delivery methods for the program.
Conrath plans to hold a public forum in January, during
which she and Treasurer Jeff McCuen will present updated
district financial information, recommendations for
reductions and a question-and-answer session.
She said she also is planning to create online surveys to
ask residents for input.
Board member Marc Schare said the main question he would ask
is, "What kind of levy would the community support in 2012?"
"The reason I think the incremental levy was so successful
is that it had been five years since an operating levy had
been passed," he said. "Would a levy be as successful if we
come back in three years, not five years? We might want to
calculate the maximum amount of a future levy and how long
we can make it last."
Board member Jennifer Best said the board "needs to look at
our expense curve to minimize it."
Conrath said some reductions could be made over time.
"We may find reductions we can't implement for a year or
two," she said. "We don't want to make changes we know will
be detrimental, but we want to make sure people understand
we have to make some budget reductions."