Letter: District should look to private sector's reductions
Published: Wednesday, January 6,
2010 6:40 PM EST
To the Editor:
If Mr. Graham's (Worthington News, Dec. 23) letters are to
have credibility, he needs to get his facts straight.
He cites my employment with Huntington Bank as the reason
for my recommending that Worthington teachers absorb a pay
cut much like that experienced by the private sector. Such
an observation is ridiculous, as I have not worked at
Huntington Bank for nearly two years.
Mr. Graham also infers that private sector pay cuts have
been driven by a reduced demand for goods. This is also
without merit.
Over the last two quarters, private sector worker
productivity, driven by higher output and reduced pay, has
increased at levels not seen since 2003. This indicates that
demand remains, with private sector employees of all types
being required to produce more while earning less as
businesses struggle with other financial factors.
Related to the district's fiscal state, Mr. Graham suggested
a "public flogging" of the board if our school system had
been as badly managed as Huntington Bank. Perhaps he ought
to get his whip ready given the following.
The district faced a budget shortfall of $14 million and the
potential of having key education programs eliminated just a
month ago.
While Worthington teachers are paid the 12th highest average
salary in Ohio to achieve an exemplary Performance
Assessment, eight school districts within 25 miles --
employing over 1,800 teachers -- pay their teachers at least
20 percent less while achieving a high rating.
While teachers at surrounding school districts have had
their pay frozen, Worthington teachers continue to average a
5 percent annual pay raise when all designated increases are
applied.
Despite arguments to the contrary, the facts remain. The
financial distress experienced by the district was in line
with that of the private sector that found pay cuts
necessary and the quality of education provided students
would not have been compromised by pay reductions given the
close proximity of financially motivated, highly effective
teachers.
With the next contract renegotiation, consideration ought to
be given to decreasing teacher salaries. While contrary to
the standard "throw more taxpayer dollars at it" solution,
reducing expenses by over $5 million annually -- under a 10
percent pay reduction scenario -- makes the effort worth it.