Letter: Letters highlight problems caused by union salaries
Published: Wednesday, July 7, 2010
6:44 PM EDT
To the Editor:
In a world of often bleak news, there were two bright spots
in the "Letters to the Editor" section recently (Worthington
News, June 23).
First, past Worthington Board of Education member and union
apologist Abramo Ottolenghi wrote, "... since salaries and
benefits are the largest (by far) expenditures of the
district, no real savings can be achieved without looking at
those expenditures."
Educate Worthington and many others have stated this fact
for many years and have been roundly criticized as
teacher-haters who don't care about children or their
education. Abramo should be careful what he says publicly,
or he could suffer the same fate -- even if he is right.
Hopefully, he will soon point out the connection between
those expensive union contracts -- the real 800-pound
gorilla -- and the deep cuts the students and the
Worthington program will suffer if we don't fundamentally
change those contracts, and soon.
The second bright spot was Dick Graham's letter, as a
shining example of the name-calling the community has come
to expect from the union and education advocates who think
the more you give the union, the better the students will
do. Thankfully, he at least boldly admits a fundamental
truth that the union doesn't want us to remember: It is the
students and their parents who have the greatest influence
on academic performance -- period.
He should also know by now that Olentangy delivers an equal
or superior product on far smaller union salaries.