WORTHINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION

SCHOOL BOARD VACANCY SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

 

 

Candidate’s Name: Don P.Overmyer

______________________________________________________           

 

Contact Address: 573 Oxford Street, Worthington, OH  43085            __________________________________________________________   

 

Contact Telephone Number: 614-847-4441

_______________________________________________

 

Contact Email Address:  dovermyer@att.net_

____________________________________________________   

 

Please answer all questions and send a completed questionnaire by January 16 via email to:

 

vgnezda@worthington.k12.oh.us

 

 

1. Please state your professional or volunteer activities with K-12 education, either in the Worthington School District, another school district or in a private school.

 

Volunteer at Evening Street Elementary in my daughter’s classes, grades 2-5, most Friday afternoons. PTSA at Kilbourne Middle School, this year. Assist in literature distribution for the last two levy proposals, volunteer liason with the Superintendent for Bond Issue #14.


 

  1. What personal traits, skills, or experiences would you bring to the position that you feel would make you an effective board member?

 

Patience and good listening skills. 

 

Also, my professional experience as a designer is primarily problem solving and building consensus among various parties and services, often within the context of complex circumstances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.  What do you think is the most pressing issue in the Worthington Schools?

 

I think it is maintaining an understanding on the part of the Worthington Community of the value that a high quality school system brings to our kids, as well as the peripheral benefits to the Community at large-like property value and potential economic development. Without that understanding, support erodes. The disconnection that people may have from the vitality and energy in the classrooms is, in part, a result of community concern over the cost and financial management of such a system.

 

 

  1. If it were necessary to make substantial cuts in the expenditures of the district, what areas would you cut first, and what areas would you seek to preserve?

 

This is the hard part… athletics is my initial response. I do not at this time have a good sense of how substantial an expenditure this is to the district, but this would be an obvious starting point to me-more so than any of the curriculum (including the arts). I think athletic/physical activity is extremely important, but it could possibly continue on a ‘Pay to Play’ basis, or as a booster supported activity.

 

 

  1. If it were possible to add new programs to the district, what programs would you seek to add?

 

There have been some wonderful projects in the EPP program in writing and math… it would be great to draw from those and create a format by which some of those activities could be experienced by the larger student body.

 

Technology, as in computer skills (read ‘computer literacy’), is a continuing, evolving area that is critical for students… not as an end in itself particularly, but simply as a means to facilitate ideas and problem-solving skills.

 

6.  What do you see as the impact of   “No Child Left Behind” on the Worthington Schools? What about the Ohio Core legislation?

 

Specifically regarding ‘No Child Left Behind’, the sense that I have from being in the classroom, and what I have read in the press, is that while the intent is good, the real application may not be yielding the hoped for results-to the point that it is ineffective, if not detrimental to the overall learning process. I think the fear is that the emphasis is on producing results via testing, replacing more relevant teaching experiences. I feel as if it may be more political posturing as opposed to a real, properly funded, carefully-considered initiative.

 

I am not familiar with the details of the Ohio Core legislation-assuming that you are referring to Governor Taft’s initiative – it seemed at the time that it was presented, there were some fundamental issues such as funding and implementation that needed to be realistically addressed

(not unlike ‘No Child Left Behind’), which is interesting, given that public education in Ohio has needed attention for a long time, as in, it should have always been a priority…

 

7.  If selected, what do you see as your role in influencing state education laws and policies that affect the Worthington Schools?

 

I would be a proponent of maintaining the existing quality of our schools-to question and challenge any potential compromise as a result of an ‘averaging’ of all school districts throughout the state.

 

 

  1. What do you see as the roles and responsibilities of a school board member?

 

To help provide and consider different perspectives on the variety of issues that confront the schools­-­and collectively reaching solutions to those issues. Part of this is acting as sounding board, to listen to ideas and concerns, and another part would to express ideas and concerns, all of which should be based in the consideration of the effect that decisions and resolutions may have in the classroom and community.

 

 

9.  What evidence do you believe shows the Worthington Schools are adequately, or inadequately, preparing students for their lives after graduation? 

           

The curriculum, as I have witnessed from my daughter’s experiences, is oriented to thinking and creative exploration- drawing upon the experience from one discipline to inform or provide a perspective to another experience or discipline. It is sensitive to the fact that people learn at different rates, and in different manners. The curriculum strives to provide a broad base of interrelated references.

 

The other important note is the emphasis on mutual respect and citizenship. I hear more comments about this than the academics.

 

These are all important foundations to provide for the future.

 

Initiatives like the Alternative Middle School are evidence also… the presentation made at Kilbourne Middle School was very impressive and stimulating-the younger faculty demonstrated some very innovative ideas and perspectives based on convincing research… it was encouraging to see that kind of energy… it was encouraging to have young faculty bringing fresh ideas – the world changes rapidly and we need to listen to those who are close to the changes to continue to be a viably excellent system.