WORTHINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION

SCHOOL BOARD VACANCY SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

 

 

Candidate’s Name: __________Douglas Southgate_______________________________   

 

Contact Address: ____________455 Longfellow Avenue, Worthington, Ohio 43085____      

 

Contact Telephone Number: ___614-292-2432 (office): 614-431-9455_______________

 

Contact Email Address: _______southgate.1@osu.edu           ______________________     

 

Please answer all questions and send a completed questionnaire by January 16 via email to:

 

vgnezda@worthington.k12.oh.us

 

1. Please state your professional or volunteer activities with K-12 education, either in the Worthington School District, another school district or in a private school.

 

While my two children attended Worthington schools, I was involved in band boosters, coached Worthington Youth Boosters teams, and so forth.  Since the younger one graduated, in 2001, I have supported the Worthington Education Foundation and have made a number of Junior Achievement presentations.

 

Most of my volunteer activities these days take place at Ohio State University.  Examples include judging speech competitions and advising an undergraduate club.

 

2.  What personal traits, skills, or experiences would you bring to the position that you feel would make you an effective board member?

 

I have worked for more than 25 years as an economist, teaching the subject at Ohio State and conducting research and consulting in the United States and more than a dozen foreign nations. If chosen to serve on the board, I would draw on this experience to identify and help resolve choices and trade-offs facing the district.

 

In addition, many years of university teaching and involvement with college and post-graduate admissions provide me with insights into what makes for a superior education at the primary and secondary levels.


3.  What do you think is the most pressing issue in the Worthington Schools?

 

Although the academic quality of our schools compares favorably with what one finds in many neighboring districts, there is much room for improvement – in mathematics and foreign languages, for example.  The primary challenge Worthington faces is to identify the elements of a truly superior program in these and other fields and to make the investments needed to put these elements in place.

 

4.  If it were necessary to make substantial cuts in the expenditures of the district, what areas would you cut first, and what areas would you seek to preserve?

 

The fundamental principle that would guide my choices about spending would be to maintain and strengthen academic quality.  I would be very reluctant to weaken AP and foreign-language offerings, for example.  To avoid doing so, I would eliminate administrative positions and athletic teams, although I realize that spending on individual positions and teams is small relative to the district’s total budget.  Depending on enrollment projections, I would also favor closing school buildings for the sake of keeping excellent academic programs intact.

 

5. If it were possible to add new programs to the district, what programs would you seek to add?

 

It is disturbing that fewer foreign languages are taught in Worthington than was the case just a few years ago.  German has disappeared.  So has Japanese, even though I personally know of students whose study of this language in high school allowed them to achieve advanced levels of fluency during college and then to pursue careers drawing on their linguistic skills.  Can similar claims be made for any of our newer sports teams?

 

Taking advantage of partnerships available at Ohio State, which I would be delighted to facilitate, Worthington can and should implement language instruction in the primary grades.  In addition, classes in Chinese, German, Japanese, and perhaps Arabic ought to be (re)instituted.

 

I would also like to see offerings in mathematics strengthened, in particular by teaching subjects such as algebra in the lower grades.

 

6.  What do you see as the impact of   “No Child Left Behind” on the Worthington Schools? What about the Ohio Core legislation?

 

My primary worry about NCLB is that many Worthington students are spending too much time preparing for the examination.  These students would probably receive passing grades with minimal preparation.  For them, boning up for NCLB tests carries a high opportunity cost in terms of time not spent on more challenging (and interesting) academic subjects.

 

I generally support the Ohio Core, although the de-emphasis of foreign languages is disappointing.  One merit of the legislation is that it sends a clear and welcome signal of the need for students to receive the strongest possible preparation in mathematics and the sciences.


7.  If selected, what do you see as your role in influencing state education laws and policies that affect the Worthington Schools?

 

Many of the decisions made by local school districts are constrained or otherwise influenced by state-level laws and policies.  Curricular guidelines are an example.  Board members need to make legislators and other state officials aware of how current laws and policies do not really serve the overall goal of academic excellence.  They should also provide input as reforms are proposed and considered.

 

A case in point has to do with the academic preparation of teachers.  As a rule, the high-school instructors my children, their friends, and I respect the most are those who have taken advanced coursework in their respective disciplines.  However, quite a few teachers do not pursue this sort of continuing education, but instead opt to take classes in schools and colleges of education – for the sake of improving where they stand on the salary scale, in all likelihood.  Would state laws and regulations permit our district to provide special incentives to faculty members pursuing in-depth knowledge of the material they teach?  This is a matter worth pursuing.

 

8.  What do you see as the roles and responsibilities of a school board member?

 

At any level, educational leadership involves working with key stakeholders to define a vision of academic excellence and to identify and implement the measures needed to realize this vision.  These tasks require team-building and communications skills, not to mention knowledge of the educational challenges facing our community and nation.  In the face of globalization and stunningly rapid technological change, these challenges boil down to providing today’s students (and tomorrow’s professionals and citizens) with a superior education, in terms of analytical capacity, a facility with languages (our own and those of other people), and a keen appreciation of history (again, our own and others’).  As we succeed in doing all this, more families with high aspirations for their children will choose to settle in our community, which will enhance the demand for academic excellence.

 

9.  What evidence do you believe shows the Worthington Schools are adequately, or inadequately, preparing students for their lives after graduation? 

 

While generally encouraging, the anecdotal evidence is a little mixed.  Many former Worthington students, including my own children, have done well in college and beyond, largely thanks to excellent preparation at the primary and secondary levels.  But I am also aware of students who have under-performed in college after compiling high GPAs and admirable lists of extracurricular activities and accomplishments at TWHS and WKHS.

 

It is difficult to move beyond anecdotal evidence of this sort.  Part of the problem is that grade inflation, which is severe not just in Worthington but in many other districts, renders GPAs meaningless for a large number of students, which obviously makes it hard for their parents and them to judge their academic progress.  I do not have any specific proposals for dealing with grade inflation.  After all, it is a widespread phenomenon in colleges and universities, including Ohio State.  However, a serious discussion of the issue is warranted, as is investigation of the solutions being tried or considered in other school systems.