WORTHINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION

SCHOOL BOARD VACANCY SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

 

 

Candidate’s Name: __________Geoffrey P. Scott________________________________  

 

Contact Address: ___805 Olenhurst Court, Columbus, Ohio 43235__________________     

 

Contact Telephone Number: _____(W)_614/923-3119______(H) 614/436-8521_______

 

Contact Email Address: _______gps@bhmlaw.com______________________________    

 

Please answer all questions and send a completed questionnaire by January 16 via email to:

 

vgnezda@worthington.k12.oh.us

 

1. Please state your professional or volunteer activities with K-12 education, either in the Worthington School District, another school district or in a private school.

 

I received my undergraduate degree in Social Studies and Earth Science Education from The Ohio State University in 1990.  I worked for Gary Moore’s Adventure Education Center at Camp Mary Orten immediately following graduation.  I then worked as an educational aide at Worthington Kilbourne High School for 3 years when I started law school.  While at Kilbourne, I organized and ran an evening intramural basketball league and was an assistant track coach.  Presently, I am a Den Leader in my son’s Cub Scout troop.

 

2.  What personal traits, skills, or experiences would you bring to the position that you feel would make you an effective board member?

 

I have significant experience on other public service boards and committees.   I served on the City of Worthington Board of Zoning Appeals, which gives me experience working on a public board.  I served on the Council for Older Adults of Delaware County, which oversaw the expenditure of public levy monies.  I am the incoming president of the Worthington Educational Foundation and am the past chairman of the Columbus Bar Association Estate Tax Committee, which demonstrates leadership in my profession and community.

 

My family is also a long time resident of the community.  I believe my grandfather Halliday served on the Worthington School Board when the Sharon School was built in the late 40’s or early 1950s.  My mother, Susan Scott, graduated from Worthington in 1959.  Both my parents spent the bulk their teaching careers in, and retired from, Worthington.  I started in Worthington as a kindergartener at Brookside Elementary and graduated from Worthington in 1986.  I purchased my parent’s home when they moved and my son is a 1st grader at Bluffsview Elementary.  My wife, Kristin, taught Spanish at Kilbourne Middle School for nine years.  Thus, I have a deep understanding of the history of Worthington as a school district and community, and a vested commitment to its future.

 

I believe my training and experience as an educator gives me insight into the needs of students, teachers and administration.  I believe that I would be polite and collegial in my interactions with other board members, but am confident and assertive enough to push a minority viewpoint and challenge conventional thinking.

 

3.  What do you think is the most pressing issue in the Worthington Schools?

 

I believe Worthington Schools is doing an excellent job as evidenced by its rating.  Therefore, I do not have a specific agenda for radical change. 

 

However, Worthington is in a period of transition from a young, growing community to an older, more stable one.  The forces that are driving this change are not entirely within the control of the district.  Those forces include the overall aging of the population, the closing off of new development within the district, the community’s aging housing stock and the escalating cost of public employment.  The task for the district’s leadership is successfully managing that change.  

 

Upper Arlington, Grandview and Bexley have successfully managed the transition from developing to developed communities, and may serve as a model.  As for the spiraling cost of public employment, I do not believe there is a simple solution.

 

4.  If it were necessary to make substantial cuts in the expenditures of the district, what areas would you cut first, and what areas would you seek to preserve?

 

Core academics must be protected at the expense of electives and extracurricular activities, if that is the choice before the Board.  However, I do not believe that is the choice before the Board.  Additionally, excessive focus on these core academics to the exclusion of other educational activities is undesirable.  I strongly believe the humanities and extra-curricular activities are critical to the full development of the human potential.  A rich offering of these subjects is necessary to preserve Worthington’s position as a top tier school district.

 

Because most of the district’s operating expense comes in the form of salaries and benefits, it would be exceedingly difficult to make substantial cuts in expenditures without cutting people.  Additionally, because most of those people are under a collective bargaining agreement, the district has limited flexibility to make such cuts.  This flexibility is further limited by numerous state and federal mandates.  My point being that it would be imprudent of me to declare what I would and world not cut before knowing more about what is possible.

 

Although I gasped at my latest property tax bill, I believe that a district publicly fixated on cutting expenditures is presenting a school district in decline.  As a public official, a board member must be focused on the prudent expenditure of funds, not cutting for cutting’s sake.  I realize that emphasizing the cuts the district has made in recent years is necessary to maintain credibility with certain segments of our community; however, it is not the message people my age and in my economic position necessarily want to hear.  My focus would be on what the district is spending its money on now and in the future, and not on what it is no longer funding.

 

5. If it were possible to add new programs to the district, what programs would you seek to add?

 

Worthington must offer programs comparable to Upper Arlington, Dublin, Olentangy and New Albany.  I realize this objective poses serious challenges to the district and community as a whole.  However, Worthington must meet that challenge if it wants to successfully manage the transition discussed in Question 3. 

 

6.  What do you see as the impact of   “No Child Left Behind” on the Worthington Schools? What about the Ohio Core legislation?

 

I am not impressed or pleased with state and federal attempts to “standardize” public education in the name of “accountability”.  I believe these legislative acts merely create new layers of administrative complexity at great cost with limited benefits to students.  I believe these efforts, although perhaps well intentioned, are largely political grandstanding to mollify the public and give the impression that legislators are “doing something about the problem”.  I think this movement has unnecessarily roiled public education and diverted scarce intellectual and financial resources from its mission in places like Worthington. 

 

7.  If selected, what do you see as your role in influencing state education laws and policies that affect the Worthington Schools?

 

I believe that state legislators will listen to other elected public officials, such a school board members, because those board members have the backing of voters a legislator needs to be re-elected.  Thus, my role as a board member would be to use that influence to help develop law and policy.  Additionally, as experts in the needs of our districts, we have a duty to educate our legislators as to those needs.    

 

The most pressing issue at the state level is school funding and I am deeply conflicted about the alternatives faced by the Ohio General Assembly.  I am very concerned that whatever resolution comes out of that debate will not be beneficial for districts like Worthington, as evidenced by the collateral impact of the CAT tax.  I don’t believe the CAT tax is the final resolution of that issue.

 

8.  What do you see as the roles and responsibilities of a school board member?

 

The primary role of a school board member is that of the taxpayer’s representative.  He is responsible for the prudent expenditure of public funds to see that the community’s children are prepared to compete in the world at the level the community expects.  To that end, the board sets education and funding policy at a high level and hires administrators to oversee the implementation of that policy.  The board does not implement that policy, but instead delegates that responsibility to administration.  If administration is not capable of carrying out the policy, the board must find administrators who can and will carry out the policy. 

 

The responsibility of a board member is to become informed of the specific issues within the district and knowledgeable of the potential alternatives.  One source of information is the public, and a second is administration.  A board member should listen to administration as experts on these issues, but be sufficiently informed and confident enough in his own ability to challenge their recommendations.

 

A school board member is a public representative of the district and must present the board as a competent, collegial body.  He must be an advocate for the district.

 

9.  What evidence do you believe shows the Worthington Schools are adequately, or inadequately, preparing students for their lives after graduation? 

 

One piece of evidence would be post-secondary education levels and graduation rates.  However, I have a sense that the exceedingly high rates sometimes cited by the district are misleading, and would like to learn more about what those numbers really mean.  Generally, I am wary of statistical data that purports to objectively prove effectiveness in an endeavor that is so inherently subjective and dependent upon context.

 

The ultimate piece of evidence is whether Worthington continues to attract young, hardworking professional people to move to, and live in, the district where their children are to be educated.  This attraction must overcome the competing desire of young families to have newer and larger houses that other districts have in greater supply.